Difference between revisions of "Talk:Professor420"
Omnipotent-Q (talk | contribs) (Neutrality) |
|||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
All flash and no substance. No real ideas or directions here. Just a dissatisfied rant by someone who doesnt understand the workings of an internet forum. | All flash and no substance. No real ideas or directions here. Just a dissatisfied rant by someone who doesnt understand the workings of an internet forum. | ||
| + | |||
| + | == Neutrality == | ||
| + | |||
| + | Seen as the Leader of the Wiki doesn't seem to understand the difference between User and Article namespaces and the clear fact that an article should be on the subject of the article, and not what the subject of the article thinks or has opinions on, I've put a well deserved Neutrality warning on the article. | ||
| + | |||
| + | Not that I would want to make accusations, but some could think that the real reason the rant remains is due to some kind of a bias between towards Prof by Perikles and that you both discussed the reversion over MSN or something to that nature (The edit times are extremely close to each other). [[User:Omnipotent-Q|Omnipotent-Q]] 16:32, 13 April 2007 (CDT) | ||
Revision as of 14:32, 13 April 2007
I've forwarded Prof to my page... if any of the other "ProfXYZ" members want they can remove it, or Prof can forward to a disambiguation page.
The internet = serious business - Livia
All flash and no substance. No real ideas or directions here. Just a dissatisfied rant by someone who doesnt understand the workings of an internet forum.
Neutrality
Seen as the Leader of the Wiki doesn't seem to understand the difference between User and Article namespaces and the clear fact that an article should be on the subject of the article, and not what the subject of the article thinks or has opinions on, I've put a well deserved Neutrality warning on the article.
Not that I would want to make accusations, but some could think that the real reason the rant remains is due to some kind of a bias between towards Prof by Perikles and that you both discussed the reversion over MSN or something to that nature (The edit times are extremely close to each other). Omnipotent-Q 16:32, 13 April 2007 (CDT)
