Difference between revisions of "User talk:Arima"
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
[[User:Tango12345|Tango12345]] 12:36, 18 October 2012 (MDT) | [[User:Tango12345|Tango12345]] 12:36, 18 October 2012 (MDT) | ||
| − | :Is that really okay | + | :Is that really okay? Because a Comparative Analysis is derived from personal research and opinion. And Official Information and Personal Input should be kept separate. |
| − | --[[User:Arima|Arima]] 18:46, 18 October 2012 (MDT) | + | |
| + | :I used the example provided by this wiki as a basis for my approach. | ||
| + | :http://www.ufopaedia.org/index.php?title=Weapons | ||
| + | :http://www.ufopaedia.org/index.php?title=Weapon_Analysis | ||
| + | :--[[User:Arima|Arima]] 18:46, 18 October 2012 (MDT) | ||
Revision as of 17:55, 18 October 2012
First, thank you for editing the TWC Wiki.
I've noticed you've created a number of pages comparing different units to each other. To be brutally honest it is better for information of this kind to be put on individual unit pages, in keeping with the attempt at a system we already have. (I say attempt deliberately as no system on the wiki is yet universal.) Therefore, could you please edit individual unit pages rather than making A vs B vs C articles? It would be much appreciated. If an article for a unit doesn't yet exist, as is the case for many FOTS units, then you can of course create it yourself. I didn't delete the comparison and "analysis" articles at once, as I do not believe in deleting anything except spam without warning.
Regards, Tango12345 12:36, 18 October 2012 (MDT)
- Is that really okay? Because a Comparative Analysis is derived from personal research and opinion. And Official Information and Personal Input should be kept separate.
- I used the example provided by this wiki as a basis for my approach.
- http://www.ufopaedia.org/index.php?title=Weapons
- http://www.ufopaedia.org/index.php?title=Weapon_Analysis
- --Arima 18:46, 18 October 2012 (MDT)
