Difference between revisions of "Category talk:Civitate"
(New page: Does anyone else think the present membership thing is a bit pointless since this is a category anyway?--~~~~) |
|||
| (One intermediate revision by one other user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Does anyone else think the present membership thing is a bit pointless since this is a category anyway?--[[User:Spiff|Spiff]] 14:56, 23 April 2007 (CDT) | Does anyone else think the present membership thing is a bit pointless since this is a category anyway?--[[User:Spiff|Spiff]] 14:56, 23 April 2007 (CDT) | ||
| + | |||
| + | except there seem to be a lot more on list than in category pages ... Not sure we want all civitates including those not seen for years to have a page linked to category. Is there a search on TWC that we could link to that would generate up-to-date list to save us having to reproduce / up-date it here? [[User:Makanyane|Makanyane]] 15:46, 23 April 2007 (CDT) | ||
| + | |||
| + | Sim can generate the list very quickly with a more advanced search, and i believe there is a script he wrote to convert into wiki format of lists. You're right though the membership list goes far beyond the actual number of articles (and most articles on members are just skeletons at the moment). I knew there was a reason for having two lists.. just couldn't remember what.. --[[User:Spiff|Spiff]] 17:21, 23 April 2007 (CDT) | ||
Latest revision as of 15:21, 23 April 2007
Does anyone else think the present membership thing is a bit pointless since this is a category anyway?--Spiff 14:56, 23 April 2007 (CDT)
except there seem to be a lot more on list than in category pages ... Not sure we want all civitates including those not seen for years to have a page linked to category. Is there a search on TWC that we could link to that would generate up-to-date list to save us having to reproduce / up-date it here? Makanyane 15:46, 23 April 2007 (CDT)
Sim can generate the list very quickly with a more advanced search, and i believe there is a script he wrote to convert into wiki format of lists. You're right though the membership list goes far beyond the actual number of articles (and most articles on members are just skeletons at the moment). I knew there was a reason for having two lists.. just couldn't remember what.. --Spiff 17:21, 23 April 2007 (CDT)
