Difference between revisions of "Talk:Archer"
From TWC Wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search (remembered why this was minimised) |
|||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
:For the unit, one could simply use "archers" instead. But I agree, it's a mess. I think there was some actual page on (Horse)Archer some time, but it was deleted as a "duplicate" [[User:Meneth|~Meneth]] 02:20, 7 January 2011 (MST) | :For the unit, one could simply use "archers" instead. But I agree, it's a mess. I think there was some actual page on (Horse)Archer some time, but it was deleted as a "duplicate" [[User:Meneth|~Meneth]] 02:20, 7 January 2011 (MST) | ||
| + | |||
| + | ::Ah - I've remember part of reason for it getting mangled. Think at one stage it was removed on his request as it contained debatable info (he was heavily involved around the time of the site sale which caused a lot of controversy). I'll try and sort out redirects to current name, but please don't 'stub' the page. It should be left as minimal as possible and just point on to his forum profile... Yup, "archers" would do for unit I'll just use this as redirect - [[User:Makanyane|Makanyane]] 05:24, 7 January 2011 (MST) | ||
Latest revision as of 05:24, 7 January 2011
Most of the pages linking to this are actually about HorseArcher [1] - links and redirects are in a complete mess probably due to previous name changes! Instead of developing this page from a stub it could probably do with being a disambig (in case anyone refers to Archer units.. ) and other links to HA should be sorted -Makanyane 01:49, 7 January 2011 (MST)
- For the unit, one could simply use "archers" instead. But I agree, it's a mess. I think there was some actual page on (Horse)Archer some time, but it was deleted as a "duplicate" ~Meneth 02:20, 7 January 2011 (MST)
- Ah - I've remember part of reason for it getting mangled. Think at one stage it was removed on his request as it contained debatable info (he was heavily involved around the time of the site sale which caused a lot of controversy). I'll try and sort out redirects to current name, but please don't 'stub' the page. It should be left as minimal as possible and just point on to his forum profile... Yup, "archers" would do for unit I'll just use this as redirect - Makanyane 05:24, 7 January 2011 (MST)
