Difference between revisions of "TWC Talk:FAQ"
From TWC Wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search (New page: should be now as the forum version but a few comments: :there isn't a link on the forum article to the Vbulletin guide & I don't know where that is meant to be :would like to point out the...) |
|||
(One intermediate revision by one other user not shown) | |||
Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
:the ES staff list doesn't seem to tie up with what they quote in their wiki section.<br> | :the ES staff list doesn't seem to tie up with what they quote in their wiki section.<br> | ||
this might be better split into separate pages in the end. --[[User:Makanyane|Makanyane]] 16:25, 9 July 2007 (CDT) | this might be better split into separate pages in the end. --[[User:Makanyane|Makanyane]] 16:25, 9 July 2007 (CDT) | ||
+ | |||
+ | ==Comment on formatting== | ||
+ | I removed the <nowiki><div class="section"></nowiki> bits because they aren't really necessary (unlike at [[TWC:Constitution]], where you can't really get rid of the need for them because the document structure is unchangeable, except by the Curator). The TWC: namespace should of course be set off from others, but this is a pretty awkward way to do it, requiring manual mucking about in the wiki source rather than a nice border or background image or something. —[[User:Simetrical|Simetrical]] ([[User talk:Simetrical|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Simetrical|contribs]]) 17:58, 9 July 2007 (CDT) | ||
+ | |||
+ | :OK, thanks you're right, I got a bit too hung up on that... Wonder if it would now look better with most of the headings moved up a level so Reputation, Member Ranks etc. are level 2 and get the underline to break up the page a bit? --[[User:Makanyane|Makanyane]] 00:07, 10 July 2007 (CDT) |
Latest revision as of 22:07, 9 July 2007
should be now as the forum version but a few comments:
- there isn't a link on the forum article to the Vbulletin guide & I don't know where that is meant to be
- would like to point out the Wiki editor isn't a 'he'
- the ES staff list doesn't seem to tie up with what they quote in their wiki section.
this might be better split into separate pages in the end. --Makanyane 16:25, 9 July 2007 (CDT)
Comment on formatting
I removed the <div class="section"> bits because they aren't really necessary (unlike at TWC:Constitution, where you can't really get rid of the need for them because the document structure is unchangeable, except by the Curator). The TWC: namespace should of course be set off from others, but this is a pretty awkward way to do it, requiring manual mucking about in the wiki source rather than a nice border or background image or something. —Simetrical (talk • contribs) 17:58, 9 July 2007 (CDT)
- OK, thanks you're right, I got a bit too hung up on that... Wonder if it would now look better with most of the headings moved up a level so Reputation, Member Ranks etc. are level 2 and get the underline to break up the page a bit? --Makanyane 00:07, 10 July 2007 (CDT)