Welcome to the TWC Wiki! You are not logged in. Please log in to the Wiki to vote in polls, change skin preferences, or edit pages. See HERE for details of how to LOG IN.

Difference between revisions of "Template talk:Mod3"

From TWC Wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
(New page: Have been trying to borrow similar layout to the CVG template on http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rome:_Total_War that stays on right and lets text flow round it - I seem to be missing somethi...)
 
Line 1: Line 1:
 
Have been trying to borrow similar layout to the CVG template on http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rome:_Total_War
 
Have been trying to borrow similar layout to the CVG template on http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rome:_Total_War
 
that stays on right and lets text flow round it - I seem to be missing something as mine is always either above or below text - any ideas? --[[User:Makanyane|Makanyane]] 17:42, 4 October 2007 (CDT)
 
that stays on right and lets text flow round it - I seem to be missing something as mine is always either above or below text - any ideas? --[[User:Makanyane|Makanyane]] 17:42, 4 October 2007 (CDT)
 +
 +
I guess youve already looked at the code for the wiki template, but just in case its here apparently: http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Template:Infobox_CVG&action=edit . So long as the basics remain the same i dont see any reason why it shouldnt behave in the same way. --[[User:Spiff|Spiff]] 08:49, 5 October 2007 (CDT)

Revision as of 06:49, 5 October 2007

Have been trying to borrow similar layout to the CVG template on http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rome:_Total_War that stays on right and lets text flow round it - I seem to be missing something as mine is always either above or below text - any ideas? --Makanyane 17:42, 4 October 2007 (CDT)

I guess youve already looked at the code for the wiki template, but just in case its here apparently: http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Template:Infobox_CVG&action=edit . So long as the basics remain the same i dont see any reason why it shouldnt behave in the same way. --Spiff 08:49, 5 October 2007 (CDT)