Difference between revisions of "Appeals Process"
| Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
'''Chief of moderation''' | '''Chief of moderation''' | ||
| − | [http://www.twcenter.net/forums/member.php?u=12850 pannonian] | + | [http://www.twcenter.net/forums/member.php?u=12850 pannonian] |
'''Senior Moderators''' | '''Senior Moderators''' | ||
| Line 19: | Line 19: | ||
[http://www.twcenter.net/forums/member.php?u=6164 Scorch]<br/> | [http://www.twcenter.net/forums/member.php?u=6164 Scorch]<br/> | ||
[http://www.twcenter.net/forums/member.php?u=8317 scottishranger]<br/> | [http://www.twcenter.net/forums/member.php?u=8317 scottishranger]<br/> | ||
| − | [http://www.twcenter.net/forums/member.php?u=810 Valus] | + | [http://www.twcenter.net/forums/member.php?u=810 Valus] |
'''Tribunes''' | '''Tribunes''' | ||
Revision as of 16:09, 23 August 2008
The appeals system works as a ladder, where if one appeal is denied on one level, one can try the next level above. It is strongly advisable to first appeal at the lowest level, then move progressively up, as this allows for more opportunities for the appeal to succeed, or to agree mutually acceptable solutions. The appeals ladders goes thus, with the Tribunal being the final level, after which there is no further appeal. Note also that the Tribunal only deals with infractions, ie. notes and warnings, while the lower levels of the ladder can deal with all types of moderation.
Tribunal
Chief of moderation
Any senior moderator
The moderator who made the decision
Currently, the tribunes and senior moderators are:
Chief of moderation
Senior Moderators
Empress Meg
Hader
Roman_Man#3
Scorch
scottishranger
Valus
Tribunes
