Difference between revisions of "Talk:Omnipotent-Q"
Professor420 (talk | contribs) m |
|||
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
Can we add 'wiki troll' and 'vindictive washed up forumer' to your user page? For someone that spends so much time decrying TWC politics, you sure spend alot of time engaging in purposeless spitting matches, don't you? Why don't you actually contribute something worthwhile? -Prof | Can we add 'wiki troll' and 'vindictive washed up forumer' to your user page? For someone that spends so much time decrying TWC politics, you sure spend alot of time engaging in purposeless spitting matches, don't you? Why don't you actually contribute something worthwhile? -Prof | ||
| + | ---- | ||
| + | Is the new heading meant to be something standardised across the user pages? | ||
| + | |||
| + | If it is meant as personal comment I can't see why.. only change to your article I can see was Spiff's and all he did was remove proposed links to non-existent pages - as those pages appeared on wanted list and were not actually things anyone else was likely to create, or you were showing signs of working on, I would have thought that was a legitimate action ?! [[User:Makanyane|Makanyane]] 17:15, 28 April 2007 (CDT) | ||
Revision as of 15:15, 28 April 2007
Please do not take the liberty of editing user pages that do not concern you with material the user put on himself. I was told that user pages were the correct venue for these sorts of things by Simetrical back in December. -Prof
That's an article page. Your user page that Simetrical would have been referring too is at User:Professor420.
I'll even show you. Omnipotent-Q 16:27, 13 April 2007 (CDT)
Is that a picture of you or Bill Murrary? - Livia
Can we add 'wiki troll' and 'vindictive washed up forumer' to your user page? For someone that spends so much time decrying TWC politics, you sure spend alot of time engaging in purposeless spitting matches, don't you? Why don't you actually contribute something worthwhile? -Prof
Is the new heading meant to be something standardised across the user pages?
If it is meant as personal comment I can't see why.. only change to your article I can see was Spiff's and all he did was remove proposed links to non-existent pages - as those pages appeared on wanted list and were not actually things anyone else was likely to create, or you were showing signs of working on, I would have thought that was a legitimate action ?! Makanyane 17:15, 28 April 2007 (CDT)
