Welcome to the TWC Wiki! You are not logged in. Please log in to the Wiki to vote in polls, change skin preferences, or edit pages. See HERE for details of how to LOG IN.

Difference between revisions of "Talk:Historical Inaccuracies in Medieval II"

From TWC Wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
m
m (moved Talk:Historical Inaccuracies in Medieval 2 to Talk:Historical Inaccuracies in Medieval II: standardising on II rather than 2 for full name.)
 
(No difference)

Latest revision as of 07:27, 30 May 2017

Re: the comment on request for sources in the article, can't actually cite the Wikipedia article now as they deleted section, apparently as too trivial - see [1] however they only have half dozen pages on Total War and we have complete Wiki. Anyway I've backed out my editorialising which was based on something no-longer visible! I'm sure other references are around on forums but haven't time to find individually at the moment.

I think we do need to allow room to include reasonable criticisms / comments on the game here though so suggest leaving article for future expansion. (Have cited source for Budapest's history and its definitely in game.) --Makanyane 12:08, 13 July 2007 (CDT)


I hope I'm posting this correctly to discussion.

Just to log an historical inaccuracy about the start position of Crete/Iraklion in the vanilla/Kingdoms game. It should be Byzantine. From the Wikipedia article on Crete:

In 960, Nikephoros Phokas reconquered the island, which remained under Byzantine control until 1204, when it fell into the hands of the Venetians at the time of the Fourth Crusade.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Crete

FootSoldier 07:04, 23 December 2010 (MST)