Difference between revisions of "Template talk:Mod3"
From TWC Wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search (reply and thanks) |
|||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
I guess youve already looked at the code for the wiki template, but just in case its here apparently: http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Template:Infobox_CVG&action=edit . So long as the basics remain the same i dont see any reason why it shouldnt behave in the same way. --[[User:Spiff|Spiff]] 08:49, 5 October 2007 (CDT) | I guess youve already looked at the code for the wiki template, but just in case its here apparently: http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Template:Infobox_CVG&action=edit . So long as the basics remain the same i dont see any reason why it shouldnt behave in the same way. --[[User:Spiff|Spiff]] 08:49, 5 October 2007 (CDT) | ||
| + | |||
| + | :I'd started there but must have mangled something. Just tried copying that more literally and it seems to work now, thanks. Now just need to see if anyone actually likes the format, its previewed on [[End of Days]] currently. I think at least getting the box to sit at top without bumping text down. -[[User:Makanyane|Makanyane]] 11:14, 5 October 2007 (CDT) | ||
Revision as of 09:14, 5 October 2007
Have been trying to borrow similar layout to the CVG template on http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rome:_Total_War that stays on right and lets text flow round it - I seem to be missing something as mine is always either above or below text - any ideas? --Makanyane 17:42, 4 October 2007 (CDT)
I guess youve already looked at the code for the wiki template, but just in case its here apparently: http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Template:Infobox_CVG&action=edit . So long as the basics remain the same i dont see any reason why it shouldnt behave in the same way. --Spiff 08:49, 5 October 2007 (CDT)
- I'd started there but must have mangled something. Just tried copying that more literally and it seems to work now, thanks. Now just need to see if anyone actually likes the format, its previewed on End of Days currently. I think at least getting the box to sit at top without bumping text down. -Makanyane 11:14, 5 October 2007 (CDT)
