Difference between revisions of "Category talk:Featured"
m (Reverted edits by 212.11.191.67 (Talk); changed back to last version by Professor420) |
|||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
− | |||
==New Articles== | ==New Articles== | ||
Revision as of 23:30, 11 October 2007
New Articles
We need some more modding and member related articles for this section. Suggestions? --Jp26991 09:50, 20 May 2007 (CDT)
Can you bump a talk page? Anyway, bump - any ideas people? --Makanyane 02:26, 17 June 2007 (CDT)
Initial Articles
Possible Articles:
I'm sure there are more good articles. Also we need to decide what the criteria are. I would say the article needs to be informative, easy to read and aesthetically pleasing (images are recommended) and of a decent length.
--Jp26991 13:11, 20 April 2007 (CDT)
Agreeing with criteria above.
I rather like this, partly as it's something a little different to ones we're mainly linking to off front page, but on topic and seems to meet criteria.... ...err re: TWC hosted mods, did you mean before or after I messed it up? Link is actually Category:TWC_Hosted_Modifications
-Makanyane 13:33, 20 April 2007 (CDT)
Rise of Persia looks good too. Thanks for the link to the TWC mods bit, you haven't messed it up, it looks good. --Jp26991 14:23, 20 April 2007 (CDT)
I say no to the podcast one, i pasted the information in and its not really that good an article, just a list of episodes. Hosted TWC Mods maybe, though it is essentially just a list as with the podcast (informative though it is). Certainly Shaders, and The Fourth Age: Total War looks good.--Spiff 15:07, 20 April 2007 (CDT)
So I'll add these to this category then:
- The Fourth Age: Total War
- Shaders
- How to take a City
- Rise of Persia
- Total War Center Hosted Modifications
--Jp26991 09:42, 22 April 2007 (CDT)
We can add the "What a Mod Leader should know" and make that a feature or split it into sections. Someone get on that! -- Professor420 12:02, 25 July 2007 (CDT)
- Was thinking about that seeing the thread in TW Community, it really needs to be a wiki-ized version as those are individual's own takes on it, which wouldn't be suitable for editing by others (or at least would be weird) - how would you feel about starting a non-first person summary of most of the points raised so it could get started. Can incorporate a short quote from each individual piece as well with a read more... external link. -Makanyane 14:02, 25 July 2007 (CDT)
- That's a pretty big task right now and I'm trying to do documentation for my own project right now, I don't have the time, perhaps we can do it once the CoW is reformed... jeez we're going to need an army of people to help with this shit. - Professor420 01:34, 26 July 2007 (CDT)