Difference between revisions of "Talk:Archer's Plot"
| Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
Interesting. I can't say I've ever seen anything like this happen in all my time on the interweb. Arghhh...I keep hitting the edit button instead of discussion from Archer's Plot page, I hope this doesn't screw anything up. OTZ | Interesting. I can't say I've ever seen anything like this happen in all my time on the interweb. Arghhh...I keep hitting the edit button instead of discussion from Archer's Plot page, I hope this doesn't screw anything up. OTZ | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | Calle22: | ||
| + | |||
| + | I think it´s time to activate the new domain very soon...no time to sit and wait if someone can buy the TWC domain. And I first thought that this had only one conflict dimension (pro political - contra political) but it seems that it´s also the relationship between active staff/leading members vs. passive network owners in collaboration with certain members (Archer?) /C22. | ||
Revision as of 08:31, 20 January 2007
It's gone. Why?
OTZ
Meiyogen keeps deleting it, luckily I have a copy... - jp26991
That's mean-spirited. Is he/she responsible for the mess at TWC as well? OTZ
Quite obviously yes, they must not be allowed to silence us - jp26991
Interesting. I can't say I've ever seen anything like this happen in all my time on the interweb. Arghhh...I keep hitting the edit button instead of discussion from Archer's Plot page, I hope this doesn't screw anything up. OTZ
Calle22:
I think it´s time to activate the new domain very soon...no time to sit and wait if someone can buy the TWC domain. And I first thought that this had only one conflict dimension (pro political - contra political) but it seems that it´s also the relationship between active staff/leading members vs. passive network owners in collaboration with certain members (Archer?) /C22.
