Difference between revisions of "Category talk:Featured"
| Line 23: | Line 23: | ||
[[Rise of Persia]] looks good too. Thanks for the link to the TWC mods bit, you haven't messed it up, it looks good. --[[User:Jp26991|Jp26991]] 14:23, 20 April 2007 (CDT) | [[Rise of Persia]] looks good too. Thanks for the link to the TWC mods bit, you haven't messed it up, it looks good. --[[User:Jp26991|Jp26991]] 14:23, 20 April 2007 (CDT) | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | ---- | ||
| + | I say no to the [[podcast]] one, i pasted the information in and its not really that good an article, just a list of episodes. Hosted TWC Mods ''maybe'', though it is essentially just a list as with the podcast (informative though it is). Certainly [[Shaders]], and [[The Fourth Age: Total War]] looks good.--[[User:Spiff|Spiff]] 15:07, 20 April 2007 (CDT) | ||
Revision as of 13:07, 20 April 2007
Initial Articles
Possible Articles:
I'm sure there are more good articles. Also we need to decide what the criteria are. I would say the article needs to be informative, easy to read and aesthetically pleasing (images are recommended) and of a decent length.
--Jp26991 13:11, 20 April 2007 (CDT)
Agreeing with criteria above.
I rather like this, partly as it's something a little different to ones we're mainly linking to off front page, but on topic and seems to meet criteria.... ...err re: TWC hosted mods, did you mean before or after I messed it up? Link is actually Category:TWC_Hosted_Modifications
-Makanyane 13:33, 20 April 2007 (CDT)
Rise of Persia looks good too. Thanks for the link to the TWC mods bit, you haven't messed it up, it looks good. --Jp26991 14:23, 20 April 2007 (CDT)
I say no to the podcast one, i pasted the information in and its not really that good an article, just a list of episodes. Hosted TWC Mods maybe, though it is essentially just a list as with the podcast (informative though it is). Certainly Shaders, and The Fourth Age: Total War looks good.--Spiff 15:07, 20 April 2007 (CDT)
