Difference between revisions of "Regiment of Horse (ETW Unit)"
(→Factions) |
CoconutFred (talk | contribs) (added more factions) |
||
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
==Factions== | ==Factions== | ||
| − | *[[Great Britain (ETW Faction)|Great Britain]] | + | *[[Image:Austria_flag.jpg|25px]] [[Austria (ETW Faction) | Austria]] |
| − | *[[United Provinces (ETW Faction)|United Provinces]] | + | *[[Image:France_flag.jpg|25px]] [[France (ETW Faction) |France]] |
| + | *[[Image:Britain_flag.jpg|25px]] [[Great Britain (ETW Faction)|Great Britain]] | ||
| + | *[[Image:Prussia_flag.jpg|25px]] [[Prussia (ETW Faction) |Prussia]] | ||
| + | *[[Image:Spain_flag.jpg|25px]] [[Spain (ETW Faction) |Spain]] | ||
| + | *[[Image:Sweden_flag.jpg|25px]][[Sweden (ETW Faction) |Sweden]] | ||
| + | *[[Image:Dutch_flag.jpg|25px]] [[United Provinces (ETW Faction) |United Provinces]] | ||
| + | *[[Image:United_States_flag.jpg|25px]] [[United States (ETW Faction) |United States]] | ||
[[Category:Cavalry]] | [[Category:Cavalry]] | ||
Revision as of 17:21, 6 December 2010
| Regiment of Horse (ETW Unit) | |
|---|---|
 | |
| Class | Cavalry |
| Unit Size | |
| Weaponry | |
| Morale | |
| Melee Attack | |
| Ranged Attack | |
| Defence | |
| Charge Bonus | |
| Accuracy | |
| Range | |
| Ammunition | |
| Region | Europe |
| Recruitment Cost | 940 |
| Upkeep Cost | 280 |
| Turns to Build | |
| Unit Limit | |
| Building Requirements | |
| Technology Requirements | |
| Attributes | |
Overview
To this end, the horses of these regiments are all large beasts, and trained to bring out a nasty temperament: it is not just the rider who fights in some cases! They use their weight to push enemies back, while slashing to kill and maim.
Historically, many regiments of horse were raised under contract by a colonel, and were regarded as his personal property. A colonel could choose his own officers by selling commissions or by appointing his friends and cronies to the posts. He also had a free hand over drill, uniform and horses for “his” regiment, and it was not unknown for unscrupulous men to have a few “ghosts” in the regiment so that their pay could be claimed from the government and kept by the colonel. Given that the regiment was “his” property, it was also not unknown for a colonel to argue with his general if his men were ordered to carry out dangerous, unpleasant or low-status tasks. A colonel had his honor and profits to consider, after all.
